Final month, Massachusetts Governor Charlie Baker, urged the public wellness council to set in spot a 4 month statewide ban on the sales of all vaping devices. “I’m officially declaring a public wellness emergency in the Commonwealth due to extreme lung illness linked with the use of e-cigarettes and marijuana-infused vaping solutions,” he mentioned through a press conference.
In response to this, the Vapor Technologies Association (VTA) had filed a lawsuit in the U.S. District Court in Boston against Gov. Charlie Baker (R-MA) and Public Wellness Commissioner Dr. Monica Bharel, for damages getting brought on by the 4-month ban on vape solutions and devices, which includes marijuana and nicotine.
The lawsuit asked the court to declare the ban unconstitutional
The statewide ban would decimate the state’s vaping business causing “irreparable harm” to a lot of effectively which means and law-abiding retailers, suppliers, and distributors.
The VTA, which in the lawsuit joined 4 vaping retailer owners, requested that the court “enjoin and declare as unconstitutional the emergency order issued by Commissioner Bharel that has shuttered and will irreparably destroy Massachusetts’ $331 million nicotine-vapor solutions business and the livelihoods of the two,500 workers that it employs.”
The lawsuit pointed out that unless halted, the statewide ban would decimate the state’s vaping business causing “irreparable harm” to a lot of effectively which means and law-abiding retailers, suppliers, and distributors.
The ruling by Suffolk County Superior Court Judge Douglas Wilkins in Boston, did not halt the ban, nonetheless, it mentioned that Baker most likely overreached his authority in issuing the order. The judge added that unless the ban is amended it would be blocked.
Baker’s administration has been provided till the 28th of October to reissue the ban by way of an emergency regulation. Furthermore the state has been ordered to let for comments by vape shops and other members of the public.
The VTA is determined to press on
The VTA’s executive director, Tony Abboud, mentioned that the association regretted the ruling and would once again seek to block the ban, which is an “existential threat” to the state’s $331 million nicotine vaping solutions sector. The VTA added that Baker’s emergency order was an unconstitutional overreach and that it was arbitrary, as it claimed to target youth vaping, however bans the sales of e-cigs to absolutely everyone in the state, irrespective of their age.
Study Additional: Reuters